Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

The Srebrenica verdict

February 2, 2015
in News
0
0
Home News
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Niklas Jakobsson

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia last week handed down its appeal sentencing in the “Srebrenica case” against five former military commanders. The verdict was delivered in a hefty 792 pages by the Appeals Chamber but in essence meant that all five accused will be spending the rest of their lives behind bars.

In 1995 the Bosnian Serb army killed more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys in what is now known as the Srebrenica massacre. At the time the area was a UN Safe Zone protected by roughly 450 Dutch UN peacekeepers. Vujadin Popovic, Ljubisa Beara, Drago Nikolic, Vinko Pandurevic and Radivoje Miletic were found guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity in the original sentencing handed down in 2010.

The overall decision by the court to uphold the sentencing was generally agreed with.

In an article for The Conversation, Louis Monroy Santander argues that this is a decision that should be noted by politicians in the region. 

“The message from the court is that genocide took place and that those responsible will not get away with it. Now that message needs to be heard by politicians and people back home.”

But as with most legal sentencings, there were specific parts of the verdict that raised more questions than answers. In an article for Opinio Juris, Jens David Ohlin brought forward one of the more debated issues that came out of the ICTY’s sentencing. 

“In my opinion, the most critical part of the judgment relates to the connection between the defendants, their Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE), and the perpetrators who actually performed the killings.

“Again, I’m not objecting to the result in this case, but rather questioning whether the Appeals Chamber has answered the necessary doctrinal questions and whether they have given sufficient guidance to further Trial Chambers. The results here seem decidedly fact-dependent and, shall we say, under-theorized.”

Louis Monroy Santander also believes this decision is of wider significance  “The decision is important in the ongoing process of post-war reconciliation between the different ethnic groups that live in the region. These groups are still divided and mistrustful of one another. This ruling is a reminder that dialogue about the past and future is needed at all levels.”

But reconciliation might not be as easy to come by as Santander hopes. The sentencing in this case came less than a week before the International Court of Justice made its ruling in the case between Croatia and Serbia. A claim and subsequent counter-claim regarding genocide was handed down today at the ICJ. The 17 judges ruled that both claims should be dismissed in their entirety as both sides failed to prove the full extent of the claims. Social media is currently filling up with analysis and opinion of the verdicts and Justice Hub will be reflecting opinions and thoughts in the coming week. 

(Photo: Micheal Kooren/ANP)

The Weekly Hubble features the most popular or controversial international justice story of the past week and reactions on social media to the news. 

Tags: genocideICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia)Justice News
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria
ICL Media Review

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria

by ICL Media Review
November 18, 2019
0
26

In this week's review, news about the ECCC conviction of Chea and Samphan for genocide, the adjournment of Kwoyelo’s trial...

Read more
NPWJ: Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Gets a Boost

NPWJ: Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Gets a Boost

January 24, 2019
42
ICL Media Review: Charles Taylor’s ex-wife pleads not guilty in UK trial on torture in Liberia

ICL Media Review: Charles Taylor’s ex-wife pleads not guilty in UK trial on torture in Liberia

January 24, 2019
38
ICL Media Review: Uganda ordered to compensate former LRA fighter Thomas Kwoyelo

ICL Media Review: Uganda ordered to compensate former LRA fighter Thomas Kwoyelo

January 24, 2019
29
NPWJ: European Parliament to hold hearing on the current human rights and humanitarian situation in Yemen

NPWJ: European Parliament to hold hearing on the current human rights and humanitarian situation in Yemen

January 22, 2019
45

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
The Srebrenica verdict