Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

The ICC’s grand ambitions and the tempestuous reality

December 18, 2014
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By João Pires

Tjitske Lingsma is a Dutch freelance journalist and author living in the Netherlands.

Over the last few years, she’s become increasingly interested in the ICC. In 2011, Lingsma studied criminology at the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam. She thought a lot about how the media influences law through the articles that lawyers and judges read. When studying “Courts and Tribunals”, she first visited the ICC and ended up writing a series of eight articles showing how the ICC works from the ground up.

These articles served as a base for her new book published this week, called “All Rise: De grote ambities van het Internationaal Strafhof en de weerbarstige werkelijheid (the ICC’s grand ambitions and the tempestuous reality).”

Its objective is to explain to a broader audience how the ICC works, what trials look like, the drama behind the scenes and how victims see the court.

The book looks at the rules and the history, the relationship between The Hague and the Netherlands and the position of victims and witnesses. It includes a number of case studies in Kenya, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ivory Coast, Libya and the Central African Republic (CAR).

“I focused in on one court, a court which is not doing very well. It is very hard to measure the effectiveness of the court. In an interview with ICC Judge Silvia Steiner, I asked her , “what do you think is the ICC’s biggest task and where does its importance lie?” The judge replied with “deterrence”.

 Of course, that’s important. However, it’s questionable whether the prosecution of some people would deter others from continuing to participate in crimes.

While Jean Paul Bemba Gombo, the former vice president of the CAR was on trial, a huge conflict resurged in the country, with people starting to speak of genocide (unofficially) due to the number of victims.

In this case, we cannot say that international law or the ICC played a preponderant role in stopping the conflict since there was no deterrent effect on the perpetrators.

Earlier this year, during the last breakout of violence in CAR, three refugees were kidnapped from a refugee camp by rebel forces.

A journalist reporting on the conflict interviewed a priest in the CAR. The priest had been protecting hundreds of Muslims in his mission. One day, Christian rebels kidnapped three Muslims. A nun told the Christian fighters: “the mission is under ICC protection and if you harm the three prisoners you might end up in The Hague”. That was a ruse, since the mission was not under ICC jurisdiction. But it worked. The leader of the Christian rebels decided the Muslims had to be returned.

When the trial against Thomas Dyilo Lubanga from the DRC started, there were only 12 people investigating. (Lubanga was convicted at the ICC of recruitment  of child soldiers.) 

Just to compare, recently 2 persons were killed in Amsterdam. The police is working with 150 people in the case. That is a much bigger effort compared to the 12 people who worked at the beginning of the Lubanga case where allegedly 800 people were killed.  

When Fatou Bensouda took over, a new policy was put into motion within the ICC.

The policy included getting more qualified people onboard, people to look at the evidence to get stronger prosecutions.

One of the biggest changes was in the method of investigation: people from a criminal network have been asked to talk about what is happening within that network, including providing evidence. They are of course entitled to protection.

It has been proven to be a very difficult method, since some people within the circle need protection, but sometimes it is not in the best interests of justice to have protection from the court, not because the court wants the person in jail but because they lie to the prosecution. This happened in the Kenyatta case and the Muthaura case. Key witnesses in the case lied.

People in the OTP now view the era of the first ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno Ocampo, as really having come to an end. It was a bad period, and they need to learn from it and hire the best people in the world.

Photo: João Pires/Justice Hub

Tags: ICC (International Criminal Court)
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
59

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
69
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
58
Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

September 22, 2018
54

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
The ICC’s grand ambitions and the tempestuous reality