Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

New African Union strategy on ICC plays politics with justice

February 4, 2017
in Insights
0
0
Home Insights
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

by Stephen A. Lamony

For the past eight years, we have been bracing for the first possible withdrawals by African states from the International Criminal Court. They began late last year, when three African State Parties decided to submit notices of withdrawal to the UN treaty office. Human rights organizations and victims’ rights groups advocated that this move would betray victims’ rights to justice, and that the court needs to be strengthened, not abandoned.

However, some African Heads of State do not share the same opinion and thus continue their push for a mass withdrawal from the Rome Statute. At its most recent summit, which concluded at the end of January, the African Union adopted an “ICC withdrawal strategy.” The document is far less conclusive than its title might suggest and does not offer a concerted concrete plan for mass withdrawal. A number of states also pushed back against its adoption. Yet, the African Union adoption of the “strategy” sends a negative signal.

Some African leaders argue that Africa has been singled out, and that bringing their heads of state to court is hindering their leaders from governing.  The African Union and Sudan have long said that the charges against President Omar al-Bashir should be condemned. The ICC has not ceased its intent to arrest and charge him as they have on the cases against President Uhuru Kenyatta, and Deputy President William Ruto of Kenya.

African States have also argued that the UN Security Council is an improper forum for selection of cases. They have argued that the UNSC has failed to address non-African situations. As well, three of the permanent five members of the UNSC, China, Russia, and the USA have failed to ratify the Rome Statute, which – because the Security Council can refer cases to the ICC – gives power to countries whose citizens are not at the mercy of the court.

NGOs committed to victims’ rights need to address the African countries’ concerns and find a way to counter the negative propaganda that the African Union is pushing.

It is unclear at this point what the effects of withdrawal will have on the ICC. Under Article 127 of the Rome Statute, a state has the legal and sovereign right to withdraw at any time. It is useful to note that the new president of the Gambia, however, said he would reverse the previous government’s withdrawal submitted to the UN. In South Africa, advocates have also challenged the legality of the government’s withdrawal as it was not approved by parliament and that case is pending.

A number of African states have also affirmed that they are determined to stay with the ICC. Nigeria, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Mali, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, and Botswana are among supporters of the court. Others such as Malawi, have announced that are committed to remaining on condition that effective and lasting change happens within the Court. Malawi, Tanzania, Tunisia and Zambia have stated that they need more time to study the withdrawal strategy.

These countries should not succumb to peer pressure to withdraw because, they would be playing politics with justice.  And withdrawing from the Rome Statute would create an impunity gap, as there is currently no regional court for holding perpetrators accountable when they commit Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, and Genocide. African state parties need to show their support for the ICC at the African Union summits, Assembly of States Parties meetings, and at the UNSC and UN General Assembly meetings. In addition countries should continue to work with the ICC on promoting High level regional seminars on fostering cooperation  and joint technical AU-ICC cooperation seminars as a way of mending fences and with ICC officials at bilateral meetings with African government officials.

 

The writer is an international lawyer and former Head of Advocacy and Policy on AU, UN and Africa Situations, Coalition for the ICC.

Related articles:

How to keep South Africa in the ICC

How to leave the ICC

Image: 28th African Union Summit/AU

 

Tags: African Union (AU)ICC (International Criminal Court)Justice Insights
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

“The Men Who Killed Me” 2.0 project: Understanding sexual violence in conflict and empowering its survivors 
Insights

“The Men Who Killed Me” 2.0 project: Understanding sexual violence in conflict and empowering its survivors 

by Justice Hub
October 7, 2018
0
50

By Anne-Marie de Brouwer, Eefje de Volder and Milena Adamczewska Video of Conversations with survivors of the 1994 Rwandan Genocide...

Read more
Mudukuti: Too many have lost sight of the victims behind egregious crimes

Mudukuti: Too many have lost sight of the victims behind egregious crimes

September 27, 2018
58
“The dialogue on international justice needs to become more diverse and global”

“The dialogue on international justice needs to become more diverse and global”

September 27, 2018
43
Rome Statute drafter: No one at the time thought we would have a functioning ICC in only 20 years

Rome Statute drafter: No one at the time thought we would have a functioning ICC in only 20 years

September 27, 2018
45
The Venom of War in northern Uganda

The Venom of War in northern Uganda

September 16, 2018
37

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
New African Union strategy on ICC plays politics with justice