Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

Major breakthrough in International Humanitarian Law?

December 3, 2014
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By João Pires

Argentine judge Silvia Alejandra Fernández de Gurmendi has over 20 years of experience in international and humanitarian Law. She’s represented Argentina in cases before the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Justice.

Since January 2010, she’s been a judge in the International Criminal Court’s Pre-Trial division.

She’s also chaired the Working Group on Rules of Procedure and Evidence and the Working Group on the Crime of Aggression.

Last month Judge de Gurmendi attended a book launch on International Humanitarian Law – the rules of war. 

The book, which deals with how this kind of law is being dealt with by courts – Applying International Humanitarian Law to Judicial and Quasi-Judicial Bodies: International and Domestic Aspects” edited by Solon Solomon, Derek Jinks and Jackson N. Maogoto – struck her, she said, because “we may well be before a judicial revolution in the application of international humanitarian law”.

She talked about how – during the negotiations to create the ICC – the states wanted to avoid too expansive a role for the court.

The negotiations in Rome during the summer of 1998 were partly based on the legal developments at the Yugoslav and Rwanda tribunals, which had been established earlier in the 1990s. When the negotiations for the ICC started in 1995, it was the year of the appeals decision in the Tadic case at the Yugoslav tribunal, which is viewed as “a small revolution in its own right, because it was the first time that a court ruled that in the eyes of the law, war crimes also exist in internal conflicts. This may sound very normal nowadays, but back then it was a major breakthrough in international law,” said the judge.

“In the negotiations, there were two opposing views”, she continued. Some wanted to stop any future judges at the ICC from applying international humanitarian law more and more expansively, while others wanted to see the process continue. 

“The result of this tension is visible in the Rome Treaty”, said the judge. It represents “a monumental effort to codify customary international law” as applied by states, so that judges are seen to be only applying states’ laws.

“States law was selected, drafted and written in the treaty. That applied to the definition of crimes, to the definition of international principles of criminal law and to the court procedure”, said the judge. 

But she pointed out that “this assimilation of internal laws and international armed conflict laws that was being provoked by the Tadic case was also accepted in the Rome Treaty, despite the fact that it was hardly perceived as customary international law at the time. However, by accepting it and including it in the Rome Treaty, it was consolidated as customary international law”.

Tags: ICC (International Criminal Court)
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
56

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
67
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
56
Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

September 22, 2018
52

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Major breakthrough in International Humanitarian Law?