Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

ICC Dictionary – Letter R

August 31, 2015
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Benjamin Duerr*

The ICC Dictionary is a guide for everyone interested in the proceedings in The Hague. It contains almost 200 of the most important terms and concepts with short explanations in alphabetical order. Justice Hub is presenting a selection of some of the terms highlighted by the Dictionary. 

Reasonable basis: Reasonable basis is the threshold judges have to apply in order to authorise the start of an investigation. It is the lowest threshold and defined Article 53(a) of the Rome Statute.

Reasonable grounds to believe: Reasonable grounds to believe is the threshold judges have to apply for the issue of an arrest warrant. There must be reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed the crimes. It is the second lowest threshold and slightly more difficult to meet than “reasonable basis.” This standard is entailed in Article 58(1)(a) of the Rome Statute.

Reason to know: “Reason to know” is a requirement to hold a person criminally liable for the conduct of others. A person can be held responsible if he fails to act although he had knowledge or “reason to know” that a crime is being committed. The idea is often used to hold commanders of armed groups liable for the acts of their troops in cases where the commander did not commit the crime himself. According to the jurisprudence of the ICTY, “specific information about unlawful acts” is not necessary. Instead, a commander can be held responsible even if he only has general information, for instance, if he “has received information that some of his soldiers have a violent or unstable character, or have been drinking.”

Referral: Besides an investigation initiated by the prosecutor proprio motu, the UN Security Council has the power to trigger the start of an investigation. The Rome Statute provides for a referral by the Security Council through a resolution adopted under Article VII of the UN Charter. Only situations can be referred, no cases. Even though the Statute does not provide for “self-referrals”, they have become a familiar concept in the first years of the ICC. States like Uganda have referred a situation in their own country to the Court. Examples of Security Council referrals are the situations in Libya and Darfur.
 
Registry: The Registry is the organ of the ICC which is responsible for the administration of the Court. It is headed by the Registrar and works in full neutrality to serve all organs and parties equally. For example, the Registry is in charge of distributing the documents to all parties, keeping the trial records and maintaining the ICC website.
 
Reparations for victims: The ICC can compel a convicted person to pay reparations to victims. Victims can apply for reparation at any time of the proceedings by filling in and submitting a standard form. In cases where the perpetrator has no financial means, the Court can also order that reparations be paid by the Trust Fund for Victims. Judges can decide to grant individual or collective reparations. 
 
Representative of victims: Every representative of victims has to apply to be able to participate in the proceedings. The representative can challenge the admissibility of a case or of evidence. The representative can be restricted to written submissions and can be denied participation if (s)he acts in a prejudicial manner.
 
Retrial: An Appeals Chamber can reverse or amend a decision made by the Trial Chamber. It can also send a case or parts of it back to the Trial Chamber, i.e., order a new trial before different judges.
 
Robinson, Arthur: Arthur Robinson (1926) is often referred to as one of the “grandfathers” of the ICC. Robinson was elected prime minister of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago in 1986. In a speech to the UN General Assembly in 1989, Robinson proposed the establishment of an international criminal court. His speech and the engagement of his country, Trinidad and Tobago, triggered the establishment of the ICC. Later, Robinson became member of the board of directors of the ICC’s Trust Fund for Victims. Arthur Robinson died in
2014.
 
Rome Statute: The Rome Statute is the founding treaty of the ICC. The document was adopted at a states’ conference on 17 July 1998 in Rome and entered into force on 1 July 2002. The Statute contains 128 articles and is organised in 13 sections. Countries that want to become a member state of the ICC must ratify the Rome Statute. So far, more than 120 countries have become member states of the Court.
 
Have a look at the other letters: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, V, W and the Numbers 1-10.
 
The ICC Dictionary by Justice Hub and ICCobserver guides you through the complex world of terms and concepts at the ICC.

Benjamin Duerr is a correspondent and foreign reporter covering the International Criminal Court and the war crimes tribunals in The Hague. 

Tags: ICC (International Criminal Court)ICC Dictionary
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
56

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
67
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
56
Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

September 22, 2018
75

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
ICC Dictionary – Letter R