Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

ICC Dictionary – Letter C

June 1, 2015
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Benjamin Duerr*

The ICC Dictionary is a guide for everyone interested in the proceedings in The Hague. It contains almost 200 of the most important terms and concepts with short explanations in alphabetical order. Justice Hub is presenting a selection of some of the terms highlighted by the Dictionary. 

Challenge to the admissibility of a case

Not every case can be brought before the ICC. An accused or a person who has had an arrest warrant issued against him/her can challenge the admissibility of a case. Also a state which normally would investigate the case can challenge the jurisdiction of the ICC. Details are set out in Article 19 of the Rome Statute.

Closed session

A closed session, also described by the Latin term “in camera”, refers to hearings that take place without the presence of the public or the media. Closed session behind closed doors are mostly used to protect witnesses or to discuss sensitive or personal issues like the health or financial situation of a person.

Command responsibility

Command or superior responsibility is a form to hold military commanders, officials or leaders of other organized groups criminally liable. The commander is not held responsible for acts of his subordinates, but for his own omission to act. He is responsible in cases where he “knew or had reason to know” that his subordinates commit crimes, and where he failed to prevent or punish the crimes. Three elements have to be proved to establish command responsibility:

1) a superior-subordinate relationship -thus, a hierarchy – must exist;
2) the commander must have the knowledge that crimes are being committed;
3) he fails to take necessary measures to prevent or punish crimes.

Common plan

To hold persons liable under the concept of co-perpetration, the prosecutor must prove that a common plan existed between at least two people. According to the ICC jurisprudence, this plan can be legal – in this case its execution must result in a crime; or the plan can be illegal in itself. An example for a common plan would be the decision of rebel commanders to recruit children under 15, or to take control of a village.

Compensation

Judges can grant financial compensation to victims of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. Persons that are recognised as victims receive reparations according to the damage, loss or injury that has been caused. The ICC has the possibility to award collective reparations – for instance a certain amount of money for a whole community. Due to the limited amount of funds and the high number of victims, collective reparations are sometimes the only possibility to involve as many victims as possible. The Trust Fund for Victims puts into practice and coordinates the compensation programme. Article 75 of the Rome Statute explains the procedures and rights.

Complementarity

The ICC is a court of last resort and gives primacy to proceedings at the national level – thus, it is seen as complementary to national courts. The ICC only intervenes if the state that would prosecute crimes is unable or unwilling to act. The principle of complementarity can be invoked by states to challenge the admissibility of a case before the ICC.

Confirmation of charges

The Confirmation of charges is a process that takes place before the commencement of every trial. After a person has been transferred or surrendered to the ICC, the Pre-Trial Chamber holds hearings which usually last between two days and a few weeks. At the hearing, the prosecution presents its evidence; the defence has time to respond. After the hearings the judges decide whether there is sufficient evidence to start a trial. They can confirm the charges, can confirm some charges while rejecting others; they can ask for more evidence from the prosecution; or they can reject the charges entirely. The Confirmation of charges process is unique to the ICC and is intended to filter cases that would not meet the high threshold for a trial.

Co-perpetration

Co-perpetration is a method to hold a person criminally liable and the same concept as Joint Criminal Enterprise at the Yugoslavia tribunal. Co-perpetration describes a person who commits a crime “jointly with another person” (Article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute). The prosecutor must prove that 

1) two or more people shared a common plan; 
2) each of the co-perpetrators played an “essential role” in the execution of the plan;
3) the co-perpetrator acted with intent and knowledge;
4) and that he knew the execution of the common would lead to the commission of a crime. 

Crimes against humanity

Crimes against humanity is a category of offenses codified in Article 7 of the Rome Statute. The prosecution has to proof two elements: the offenses must be part of a “widespread and systematic” attack on civilians. The following offenses are punishable as crimes against humanity:

– Murder;
– Extermination;
– Enslavement;
– Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
– Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
– Torture;
– Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
– Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender, or other grounds that are universally recognised as impermissible under international law;
– Enforced disappearance of persons;
– The crime of apartheid;
– Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

Cumulative charging

Cumulative charging means to charge a person with several different charges for the same particular act. For instance, an accused could be charged with rape as a war crime and rape as a crime against humanity. Cumulative charging is not prohibited at the ICC. However, in the case against Jean-Pierre Bemba, the Pre-Trial Chamber in the Confirmation of Charges decision dismissed the concept by confirming only certain charges. It hold that acts of rape may have been committed. However, the Pre-Trial Chamber dismissed the charge of torture since it was based on the same particular acts of rape. The judges ruled that, as a matter of fairness to the defence, each crime charged must contain an independent element that is not present in the other crime charged.

Have a look at the other letters: A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, V, W and the Numbers 1-10.

The ICC Dictionary by Justice Hub and ICCobserver guides you through the complex world of terms and concepts at the ICC.

Benjamin Duerr is a correspondent and foreign reporter covering the International Criminal Court and the war crimes tribunals in The Hague. 

Tags: ICC (International Criminal Court)ICC Dictionary
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
56

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
67
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
56
Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

September 22, 2018
75

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
ICC Dictionary – Letter C