Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

How does Israel prepare for the battle at the ICC?

January 27, 2015
in News
0
0
Home News
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Justice Hub

So, the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Fatou Bensouda has already announced that she will conduct a preliminary examination into the situation in Palestine. Lots of commentators have reacted: some with high expectations. But what about the two main players? We’ve examined their public pronouncements and here is what Israel’s approach appears to be. Tomorrow we examine how the Palestinians have responded.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made his government’s position clear: the ICC’s decision is “absurd”

“It’s absurd for the ICC to ignore international law and agreements, under which the Palestinians don’t have a state and can only get one through direct negotiations with Israel.”

But, underneath this clear dismissal, there are in fact a variety of ways that Israel is approaching the situation.

For instance, last week, Israel’s government watchdog, state comptroller Joseph Haim Shapira, said he was opening an investigation into “decisions made by military and political leaders during last summer’s 50-day war.” He pointed out that no ICC investigation would be launched if a state itself had conducted “objective” investigations.

Former ICC prosecutor Louis Moreno Ocampo also suggested that Israel could put off any investigation by conducting full open investigations itself. 

“Israel could achieve an even bigger impact while avoiding the intervention of the Court by inviting Palestine to create a “bilateral fact-finding committee” with experts representing all the parties to investigate alleged crimes committed by any party. This committee, which could also include international experts, could provide the evidence collected to Palestinian or Israeli Courts with jurisdiction over the case. “

This focus on a legal response to a threatened ICC investigation is also being seen as a opportunity to get any potential case thrown out before it would even come to court,  according to this report in The Jerusalem Post.

“The best thing from Israel’s perspective, the officials said, would be for the court to decide that it cannot hear the case because of “jurisdictional issues.”’

On the other hand, the immediate diplomatic reaction from both Israel and its supporters has been questioning the very basis of the ICC starting an inquiry. Their arguments have focused on whether Palestine is in fact a state – despite a decision to that effect from the United Nations General Assembly – and therefore whether the ICC would have any basis for jurisdiction. 

Alan Dershowitz at Just Security wrote:

“[the] practical problems simply illustrate the difficulties of recognizing a “state” that has no agreed upon boundaries and whose ultimate borders will be shifting in the future if peace is to be achieved. “

If that doesn’t work there’s another line of attack: According to this piece in Haaretz, Israel won’t hesitate to make use of mechanisms to call on the court to investigate the Palestinian side for war crimes.

“If the case moves forward, the [government] official warned, Israel has “many tools in our toolbox that we can use. The Palestinians are also vulnerable to legal attacks, both in the ICC and elsewhere.””

Meanwhile some parts of the Israeli government are attacking the court directly, focusing on convincing ‘foreign powers’ to cut ICC funding.

“”We will demand of our friends in Canada, in Australia and in Germany simply to stop funding it,”The Israeli minister of foreign affairs Avigdor Lieberman told Israel Radio, “This body represents no one. It is a political body.””

This approach relies on the assessment that the ICC is vulnerable to pressure. It needs the support of its members – the states parties – which include Germany and Canada. Any success in squeezing the court financially would affect its ability to face the new challenges and demands as outlined in the prosecutor’s latest strategic plan. 

In the meantime, any move to defund the court has apparently been turned down flat by the ICC’s backers.

—-

If Israel really considers the ICC decision an absurd one, why is it launching this fierce campaign against the Court?

Will Israel hold its own indepth investigations into the war last year in Gaza to prevent an ICC investigation?

How long will the ICC prosecutor take to hold a preliminary examination? 

 

(Photo: www.kremlin.ru)

Tags: ICC (International Criminal Court)Israeli–Palestinian conflictJustice News
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria
ICL Media Review

ICL Media Review: Russian veterans seek ICC investigation into use of mercenaries in Syria

by ICL Media Review
November 18, 2019
0
26

In this week's review, news about the ECCC conviction of Chea and Samphan for genocide, the adjournment of Kwoyelo’s trial...

Read more
NPWJ: Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Gets a Boost

NPWJ: Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Gets a Boost

January 24, 2019
42
ICL Media Review: Charles Taylor’s ex-wife pleads not guilty in UK trial on torture in Liberia

ICL Media Review: Charles Taylor’s ex-wife pleads not guilty in UK trial on torture in Liberia

January 24, 2019
38
ICL Media Review: Uganda ordered to compensate former LRA fighter Thomas Kwoyelo

ICL Media Review: Uganda ordered to compensate former LRA fighter Thomas Kwoyelo

January 24, 2019
29
NPWJ: European Parliament to hold hearing on the current human rights and humanitarian situation in Yemen

NPWJ: European Parliament to hold hearing on the current human rights and humanitarian situation in Yemen

January 22, 2019
45

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
How does Israel prepare for the battle at the ICC?