Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

Command responsibility – can Bemba be found guilty?

February 24, 2015
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

By Benjamin Dürr

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is expected to deliver its judgment against the Congolese politician and militia leader Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo in the near future. Bemba has been charged with two counts of crimes against humanity: murder and rape; and three counts of war crimes: murder, rape, and pillaging. The ICC prosecutor accuses Bemba of having had command responsibility for these crimes. 

Q: What’s it all about?

His case will be groundbreaking – it’s the first time that ICC judges are applying the concept of command responsibility, which is a way to hold a superior responsible for what others have done.

International crimes such as genocide and war crimes are often committed by a large number of individuals. But the persons facing trial in The Hague are sometimes not the ones who murdered, raped or pillaged themselves – they are the people who gave orders to their subordinates.

Q: What is command responsibility?

Command responsibility is a part of International Humanitarian Law – the laws of war. It was used at Nuremberg where senior officials in the Nazi regime were held responsible for what German troops had done.

It’s become a tool for prosecutors to hold the leaders of both military and other looser groups accountable.

Q: How does command responsibility work exactly?

The underlying concept of command responsibility is the assertion that superiors have a duty to either prevent crimes by their subordinates or to punish them after the crimes have been committed.

The prosecutors must prove three elements:

1. A superior-subordinate relationship must exist, and the commander must have “effective control” over his/her soldiers.

2. There must be evidence the superior “knew or should have known” that the subordinate was about to commit or had committed crimes.

3. Even though s/he had control and knew of the crimes, s/he did not take necessary steps to stop his subordinates or to punish them afterwards.

 

Q: How have prosecutors tried to use the concept?

At the Yugoslavia Tribunal, which has had 20 years to work out how to prosecute military commanders, there are examples that show command responsibility.

Zdravko Mucić was the commander of a prison camp in Bosnia and found guilty of murder and torture as war crimes even though it was his subordinates who committed the crimes. Mladen Naletilić was a Croatian military commander, who was shown to have had effective control over his troops who were attacking villages. But he was acquitted of mistreating prisoners because the prosecution couldn’t establish that he had reason to know what his men were doing.

The Yugoslavia tribunal says that commanders are held responsible for their failure to act. But at the ICC, commanders can be held responsible for their soldiers’ crimes as if they had physically committed the crimes themselves.

Q: How else can the Rome Statute hold commanders responsible?

In the case against Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, commander-in-chief of a Congolese militia, prosecutors alleged that he, together with other commanders, had a  “common plan” to take over control over the province of Ituri.  Lubanga was one of the co-perpetrators who, to make this plan succeed, built an army into which he also enlisted children.

The prosecution used videos showing Lubanga surrounded by children, and the judges found the evidence convincingly demonstrated a common plan, Lubanga’s own contribution and his intent.

In other cases at the ICC, the concept of indirect co-perpetration has been used. It’s where, for example, two militia groups carry out an attack together, the leaders share a common plan, and they are indirect perpetrators since they committed the crimes through the soldiers over which they have control.

Q: So what will apply to Bemba?

Bemba was the leader of the Movement for the Liberation of Congo (MLC) and has been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity.  According to the prosecution, his troops raped, murdered and looted in the neighbouring Central African Republic (CAR) in 2003. Bemba has denied that he had control over his men. He has argued that he was in the Democratic Republic of Congo at that time and did not know of the crimes being committed by his troops. A prosecution witness has said Bemba had a satellite phone which he used to communicate with his commanders. But a defence witness told the Court that the MLC fighters were under the control of CAR generals.

Now the judges have to decide which arguments they find more convincing.

Additional Justice Hub links:

Click here for an overview of the case.

Click here for a Q & A on the arguments in court about command responsibility in the Bemba case.

Click here for a report about the end of the trial.

Benjamin Dürr is a German journalist, based in the Netherlands.

 

Tags: crimes against humanityDRC (Democratic Republic of Congo)ICC (International Criminal Court)war crimes
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
56

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
67
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
56
Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

Iran wants Hague court to dull the impact of US sanctions (Part 2)

September 22, 2018
52

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Command responsibility – can Bemba be found guilty?