Lenah
Follow us
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
Justice Hub
No Result
View All Result

“Bound to create unreasonable expectations”: Reactions to ICC judges’ decision on Myanmar Rohingya deportations

September 6, 2018
in Justice Explained
0
0
Home Justice Explained
FacebookTwitterLinkedInWhatsappEmail

The judges at the International Criminal Court have ruled that the court has jurisdiction over alleged deportations of Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh. But not everyone thinks it’s a good move by the court.

The decision by judges at the ICC that the court does have jurisdiction over the alleged crimes means that it’s now up to prosecutor Fatou Bensouda to decide whether she has enough evidence of the specific crime – deportation – to file charges in the case.

Myanmar is not a member of the court. But neighbouring Bangladesh is a member. Around 700,000 Rohingya fled from a military crackdown last year. A recent UN investigation says mass killings and gang rapes were carried out by the military. And it has called for prosecutions of 5 generals and the commander in chief.

Myanmar has denied committing atrocities, saying that it was cracking down on militants. In the international justice field law professors have queried some of the detail of the judges’ decision, but weren’t surprised by the substance, like Kevin Jon Heller of the University of Amsterdam.

As predicted, the PTC has upheld the #ICC’s jurisdiction over deportation of the #Rohingya from #Myanmar.

— Kevin Jon Heller (@kevinjonheller) September 6, 2018

And those academics who helped inform the court by providing legal insights and arguments were understandably pleased.

The ICC has jurisdiction over deportation of #Royingha from Myanmar to Bangladesh and possibly other crimes. Majority relies extensively on @CPIJ_PCJI Amicus brief. Very proud of colleagues. @amandaghahreman @MarkKersten @RobCurrieMusic and other partners! https://t.co/qDtZz7ZNRb

— Fannie Lafontaine (@flafontaine) September 6, 2018

Human rights organizations, especially those representing victims such as Paris-based FIDH were also delighted.

We have a yes! And a glimpse of hope!@IntlCrimCourt judges rule that the Court may exercise jurisdiction over the deportation of the #Rohingya from #Myanmar to #Bangladesh https://t.co/fQBotNpc6w

— Amal Nassar (@AmalNassar_) September 6, 2018

Mark Kersten, a fellow at the Munk School in Canada, thinks this decision is positive especially in showing how the world doesn’t necessarily need to rely on the United Nations Security Council to deliver justice.

Or not… today's news shows that justice and accountability in #Myanmar can be sought in creative and interesting ways, without relying on the ineptitude and dithering approach of the Security Council which has never delivered #ICC justice https://t.co/XqXYUuciL2 #RohingyaCrisis https://t.co/DrG6pemW35

— Mark Kersten (@MarkKersten) September 7, 2018

But Douglas Guilfoyle of Monash University in Australia sees a negative side to that argument.

Second, there is a distinct risk the rest of the UN system, and especially the Security Council, will now regard itself as politically off the hook. "We don't need to do anything, the ICC is acting." I hope to be proven wrong. (3/7)

— Douglas Guilfoyle (@djag2) September 7, 2018

And he worries that the ICC isn’t without its problems already.

Fourth, one would have thought an institution facing a crisis as to its legitimacy might learn to stop picking unnecessary fights, and raising expectations it is objectively unlikely to be able to fulfil. (6/7)

— Douglas Guilfoyle (@djag2) September 7, 2018

Dov Jacobs of Leiden University in the Netherlands also points out that this decision may set up big expectations.

“…the decision is bound to create unreasonable expectations on the part of victims in relation to the relief that the ICC can effectively bring as regards what is going on more generally in Myanmar, and over which, for the most part, the ICC will not have jurisdiction. Here, as often, the ICC and its defenders will be quick to challenge those who criticise them, without realising that they are setting themselves up to fail.”

But Fabio Rossi, who works for the ICC Prosecutor (although tweeting in a personal capacity) says despite many concerns, at least it marks a step forward:

Expectations victims, prospects arrests, etc. Sure. But let’s appreciate novel move & decision #ICC OTP & Chambers confirming jurisdiction over #RohingyaCrisis in 1st place, by way of diligently implementing mandate to work towards culture of accountability. #Myanmar #Bangladesh

— Fabio Rossi (@RossiF2018) September 6, 2018

Photo: Seyyed Mahmoud Hosseini/Tasnim News Agency (Flickr)

Tags: crimes against humanityhuman rightsICC (International Criminal Court)Myanmar
ShareTweetShareSendSend

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Related Posts

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar
Featured

A legal path to justice emerges for Myanmar

by Sean Bain
October 7, 2018
0
56

On September 27 a partial but significant foundation was laid to provide accountability for gross human rights violations in Myanmar,...

Read more
Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

Lawfare: Iran-US nuclear deal row to play out in Hague Courtroom (Part I)

September 26, 2018
56
A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

A trial for history: Thomas Kwoyelo in Uganda

September 25, 2018
67
Celebrating women in peacekeeping

Celebrating women in peacekeeping

September 24, 2018
56
Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

Hague court could give Iran a moral victory over the US (Part 3)

September 22, 2018
75

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform connecting conversations about international justice.

Justice Hub

Justice Hub is an online platform aimed at a worldwide audience of 18-35 year olds, especially in countries where people are looking for sustainable and innovative solutions to problems of justice, peace and security. Justice can feel too abstract, too often owned by experts. We make the conversations lively and accessible.

Follow Us

Quick Links

  • Featured
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

 

  HPPJ Forum Login
Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
No Result
View All Result
  • My Justice
  • News
  • Insights
  • Justice Explained
  • About Us

© 2018 Justice Hub

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Login

Lost password?
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Aeon and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email nsharafa@gmail.com

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
“Bound to create unreasonable expectations”: Reactions to ICC judges’ decision on Myanmar Rohingya deportations